Hartwig Fischer to step down from British Museum

Hartwig Fischer is to step down as director of the British Museum with immediate effect following the suspected theft of items from the collection.
Deputy director Jonathan Williams has also agreed to voluntarily step back from his normal duties until an independent review into the events has concluded.
The developments come after days of national and international coverage of the suspected thefts.
In an announcement today, Fischer described the situation facing the museum as being “of the utmost seriousness”.
The crisis began in 2020 when antiquities dealer Ittai Gradel first raised concerns with the British Museum that hundreds of items he had bought on eBay may have come from its collection. Gradel submitted a more detailed dossier of the suspected thefts to the museum in 2021.
Fischer apologised for remarks he made to the media in recent days implying that Gradel had not revealed the full extent of the thefts when he first contacted the museum. In his statement today, he accepted that the museum “had not responded as comprehensively as it should have” at the time.
The museum confirmed last week that it was investigating after a number of items from its collection were found to be missing, stolen or damaged, including gold, jewellery and gems of semi-precious stones and glass dating from the 15th century BC to the 19th century AD.
The suspected thefts are thought to date back to at least 2013 and could number thousands of objects.
A senior curator was sacked last week and has since been interviewed under caution by the Met Police. No charges have been brought.
Fischer had been due to step down in 2024 and the recruitment process is already underway for his successor.
In a statement today, Fischer said: “Over the last few days I have been reviewing in detail the events around the thefts from the British Museum and the investigation into them. It is evident that the British Museum did not respond as comprehensively as it should have in response to the warnings in 2021, and to the problem that has now fully emerged.
“The responsibility for that failure must ultimately rest with the director. I also misjudged the remarks I made earlier this week about Dr Gradel. I wish to express my sincere regret and withdraw those remarks.
“I have offered my resignation to the chairman of the trustees, and will step down as soon as the board have established an interim leadership arrangement. This will remain in place until a new director is chosen.
“The situation facing the museum is of the utmost seriousness. I sincerely believe it will come through this moment and emerge stronger, but sadly I have come to the conclusion that my presence is proving a distraction.
"That is the last thing I would want. Over the last seven years I have been privileged to work with some of the most talented and dedicated public servants. The British Museum is an amazing institution, and it has been the honour of my life to lead it.”
George Osborne, chair of trustees, said: “The board of trustees has accepted the resignation of Hartwig Fisher as director. He has acted honourably in confronting the mistakes that have been made. No one has ever doubted Hartwig’s integrity, his dedication to his job, or his love for the museum.
“Hartwig had already announced his intention to step down some weeks ago, so the process of finding a new permanent director is already underway.
“The trustees will now establish an interim arrangement, ensuring that the museum has the necessary leadership to take it through this turbulent period as we learn the lessons of what went wrong, and use them to develop plans for a strong future. The trustees also wish to thank the many many staff who work so hard for the museum and keep it running.
“I am clear about this: we are going to fix what has gone wrong. The museum has a mission that lasts across generations. We will learn, restore confidence and deserve to be admired once again.”
Comments (1)
Leave a comment
You must be signed in to post a comment.
Having worked with a number of Museums in my career, how can an institution not know what objects it holds in trust for future generations? Surely a catalogue of all objects is one of a Museums core obligations and duty? After all, if you don’t know what you have in a collection how can you present a cohesive story to your visitors?
Are our large Museum institutions too big to cope now, should their collections be repatriated where possible and even devolved to the Regions?